Ghyll talk:Conflict That Is Not Happening

From Disobiki
Revision as of 11:17, 17 February 2005 by Jcowan (talk | contribs) (Fixed serious blunder)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --Jcowan 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

I really like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --Joe Bowers 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

Bravo. Excellent article, and fantastic coverage. Many points made are sure to generate debate for many moons. --DrBacchus 14:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

Fixed serious blunder

I had originally written of "the foolish notion of Oblibestircus" etc. etc., because Oblibestircus was already established in Aquentravalkeration as a foolish scholar. But it's Rancticirchiretic who believes in a connection between aquentravalkeration and the Paramount Queens. So I corrected the former to the latter here (this does not result in any global conflicts): even someone as brilliant as R. can be allowed one or two foolish notions per lifetime! --Jcowan 11:17, 17 Feb 2005 (EST)

Retrieved from "http://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Conflict_That_Is_Not_Happening&oldid=28277"