Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Howzingery"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) m (Organization has been around for awhile already.) |
(I see where you're coming from, though.) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT) | ::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:17, 8 July 2005
All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --Dfaran L'Eniarc 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
- Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --Sean B. Palmer 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
- Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --Trousle Undrhil 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
- Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --Morbus Iff 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
- Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --Dfaran L'Eniarc 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
