Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Great Awakening"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(No, it's good!) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT) | Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:32, 29 June 2005
Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. AaronSw 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the Phantom Index to find one that's appropriate. --John Cowan 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
