Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Chez Smallwood"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) (We've got a smaller clearer version in the works.) |
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) m (Ack, no inline, no inline!) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There is also a smaller image sm-smallwood.png that can be used either as a placeholder to link to the full size image or used after the article has been up for a while. Unfortunately, it gets hard to read if it gets resized too small. --[[User:Brother Arfrus|Brother Arfrus]] 15:18, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT) | There is also a smaller image sm-smallwood.png that can be used either as a placeholder to link to the full size image or used after the article has been up for a while. Unfortunately, it gets hard to read if it gets resized too small. --[[User:Brother Arfrus|Brother Arfrus]] 15:18, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| − | : | + | :[http://img239.echo.cx/img239/9089/smallwood21bp.png We've been working on a smaller version.] --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 15:48, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:49, 3 June 2005
Prudes (and the faint-of-heart) may be shocked that I should mention scuttleways in a scholarly text, but the simple fact is that people use scuttleways, even if we avoid doing it publicly. They are in our buildings, and we ought not be so ashamed of them. --Brother Arfrus 15:01, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT)
There is also a smaller image sm-smallwood.png that can be used either as a placeholder to link to the full size image or used after the article has been up for a while. Unfortunately, it gets hard to read if it gets resized too small. --Brother Arfrus 15:18, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- We've been working on a smaller version. --Morbus Iff 15:48, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT)
