Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Orthogonalities"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) (Math websites and dunno.) |
(* Questioning Orthogonalities can be dangerous to your health ... or something. Maybe. *) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT) | :The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK, so Orthogonalities are sort of like diminsions? So, while Ghyll is one diminsion, the [[Xurient]] is another one? Or am I looking at this too complicatedly? If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitant of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:20, 26 May 2005
What a cool entry :-) What did you use to create the diagrams? --Larj Zyquon 11:37, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
- The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --Morbus Iff 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
OK, so Orthogonalities are sort of like diminsions? So, while Ghyll is one diminsion, the Xurient is another one? Or am I looking at this too complicatedly? If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitant of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --Trousle Undrhil 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)
