Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Folktown Records"
(True in all possible worlds.) |
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) (Supplementary comments, and a parsing concern.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "this would obviously lead to the immediate loss of advertising revenue, so it cannot be done" - Heh! Funniest paragraph yet. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:14, 16 Oct 2004 (EDT) | + | "this would obviously lead to the immediate loss of advertising revenue, so it cannot be done" - Heh! Funniest paragraph yet. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:14, 16 Oct 2004 (EDT) (Blammo!) |
| − | (Blammo!) | + | Thank you! (The "Blammo!" above is Sean's doing, not mine, BTW.) What's even funnier is that this is equally true of Real World newspapers. --[[User:Jcowan|Jcowan]] 02:16, 17 Oct 2004 (EDT) |
| − | + | Funnily, I just heard a story about Real World newspapers the other day. A guy was trying to lessen his reading intake, and thus unsubscribed from the daily delivery. They've been calling him back for the past month, first offering him the whole week for just the cost of the Sunday issue (2.50US), and then again for HALF the cost of the Sunday issue. As you've said, they solely wanted to keep him as a subscriber for their own statistical integrity with their advertisers. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 20:44, 18 Oct 2004 (EDT) | |
| + | |||
| + | Jcowan: parse error. What does ''All scholars who have treated of the matter agree that the term is sometimes derogatory...'' mean? Is this right? --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 20:44, 18 Oct 2004 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 18 October 2004
"this would obviously lead to the immediate loss of advertising revenue, so it cannot be done" - Heh! Funniest paragraph yet. --Sean B. Palmer 05:14, 16 Oct 2004 (EDT) (Blammo!)
Thank you! (The "Blammo!" above is Sean's doing, not mine, BTW.) What's even funnier is that this is equally true of Real World newspapers. --Jcowan 02:16, 17 Oct 2004 (EDT)
Funnily, I just heard a story about Real World newspapers the other day. A guy was trying to lessen his reading intake, and thus unsubscribed from the daily delivery. They've been calling him back for the past month, first offering him the whole week for just the cost of the Sunday issue (2.50US), and then again for HALF the cost of the Sunday issue. As you've said, they solely wanted to keep him as a subscriber for their own statistical integrity with their advertisers. --Morbus Iff 20:44, 18 Oct 2004 (EDT)
Jcowan: parse error. What does All scholars who have treated of the matter agree that the term is sometimes derogatory... mean? Is this right? --Morbus Iff 20:44, 18 Oct 2004 (EDT)
