Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Articulary Motion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) (You've made the same error on your new B entry.) |
m (* Okie dokey *) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT) | :You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Ah ... I guess I misunderstood that. Ok, well, I have corrected the B entry and I guess you did alright with this one. :-D --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 08:16, 24 May 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:16, 24 May 2005
OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --Trousle Undrhil 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
- You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one new phantom and one existing phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two new phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --Morbus Iff 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
- Ah ... I guess I misunderstood that. Ok, well, I have corrected the B entry and I guess you did alright with this one. :-D --Trousle Undrhil 08:16, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
