Difference between revisions of "Ghyll:Round 3 discussion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) |
Morbus Iff (talk | contribs) (Should there be a Round 3?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | ==Should There Be A Round 3?== | |
| + | |||
| + | Are you interested? Would you play? What (rules, date, style, etc.) should change? What makes you unhappy? I've had every intent to keep the Ghyll Lexicon going as long as there are players (and perhaps longer) - in the absence of them, I'd probably move on to other (slower, less regular) products such as a Ghyll game book ("Poor Ghyllians Almanac" is the most popular choice at the moment, though that, honestly, is years away). Some folks have been debating privately whether to drop out, and their dissatisfaction partly comes from the quality of phantoms being produced (and thus, needing to be written). What sort of phantoms and entries do you prefer to write? --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:08, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:08, 16 September 2005
Should There Be A Round 3?
Are you interested? Would you play? What (rules, date, style, etc.) should change? What makes you unhappy? I've had every intent to keep the Ghyll Lexicon going as long as there are players (and perhaps longer) - in the absence of them, I'd probably move on to other (slower, less regular) products such as a Ghyll game book ("Poor Ghyllians Almanac" is the most popular choice at the moment, though that, honestly, is years away). Some folks have been debating privately whether to drop out, and their dissatisfaction partly comes from the quality of phantoms being produced (and thus, needing to be written). What sort of phantoms and entries do you prefer to write? --Morbus Iff 09:08, 16 Sep 2005 (EDT)
