Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Great Awakening"

From Disobiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Bit of a misunderstanding here, I think)
m (Resolved.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. --[[User:AaronSw|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
+
{{ResolvedTalk}}
 
 
:I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece.  However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem).  You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Ghyll Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate.  --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 
 
 
:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 
 
 
:Intellectuals' Conspiracy isn't a new phantom. I created it in Deathood. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 00:31, 30 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 20:29, 5 July 2005

This Talk: page once existed, but has since been resolved, refactored, or made irrelevant.
To see the text that was once here, choose a previous version under the History tab.
If you need to add new discussion, remove the reference to this template.