|
|
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Out-Of-Game Discussion==
| + | {{ResolvedTalk}} |
| − | | |
| − | It came out longer than expected, as the bishop once said......--[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]] 06:20, 13 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | There appears to be some problem - Andelphracian Lights were created by Andelphracia, who would have only been 5 years old in -325 EC. It's hard to think that she would have created the lights, and for them to have enough gestation to be the cause of a battle. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 13:14, 13 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Not sure on this- doesn't the entry use Andelphracian Lights as a common modern example of smilching? Perhaps these smilchers practiced a very primitive form of smilching- firey sticks or some such? Unfortunatley, this ancient history is outside my area of expertise, but I am looking forward to hearing those more learned about this ancient era elaborate. When dealing with such ancient dates from the time of legend though, it wouldn't surprising if there would be some difficulty defining a date so precisely... but I think for this layeperson, the crux that needs clarifying in this entry is: did this war precede Andelphracia's discovery or did in fact her new, superior smilching method predicate it? --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 14:40, 13 Sep 2004
| |
| − | | |
| − | Hmm, I guess I can see that particular approach. Is that your intention, Gineste? There seems to be a lot of flexibility on a quick re-scan: these battles could still be going on, no master smilching technique has been agreed upon, and so on and so forth. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 14:53, 13 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | that's the way I see it; I wanted to link in, but not explicitly or overtly, a number of strands, whilst leaving space for others to digress upon.... my strands are 1) a clear relation between andelphracian lights and altoxian bulbs; 2) our lack of information about so many things ancient, which urgently needs at least the framework of an explanation, and so conflict and iconoclasm sprang to mind (the Raking etc;) and 3) the desire to see some discussion of the physical (ie scientific) structure of this world-what is the underlying unity? how does obith relate light to noise, if that's what it is? But principally it just sort of came out....
| |
| − | --[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]] 15:01, 13 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
Latest revision as of 15:17, 13 May 2005
This Talk: page once existed, but has since been resolved, refactored, or made irrelevant.
To see the text that was once here, choose a previous version under the History tab.
If you need to add new discussion, remove the reference to this template.
