|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Out-Of-Game Discussion==
| + | Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT) |
| − | | |
| − | Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry, but please note that it has too many citations: you're meant to reference only ''one'' existing one, and ''two'' new entries (i.e. phantom entries), but you've listed several. The rationale is that if we define too many phantom entries, it's going to be impossible for us to catch up in subsequent turns. Please pick just one existing one, and two new ones. No need to change the body of your entry, just the '''Citations''' bit at the bottom -- we'll do the rest. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT) | |
| − | | |
| − | Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == How the devil... ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none.
| |
Latest revision as of 08:48, 31 May 2005
Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry. --Sean B. Palmer 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
