Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Dagger Seas"

From Disobiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Citation problem)
m (Resolved.)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Wow. Given [[Talk:Cranee_Historical_Society|the recent state of the art]], this entry is like
+
{{ResolvedTalk}}
a worst case scenario. I introduce all of this throw-away history for the sake of a cheap joke.
 
But it's a joke I kinda like; If anybody is annoyed by The Habit of Coming Up With Long Names
 
For Imperial Cultures That Could Just As Easily Be Anonymous, lemme know and I'll cut
 
them from the entry.  I just stumbled on the Cranee Historical Society thread after completing
 
the entry...
 
 
 
--[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]] 00:31, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT)
 
 
 
== Citation problem ==
 
 
 
All of your formal citations are to phantoms.  You have to cite one actually existing article and two novel phantoms (which must be the ''only'' novel phantoms in your text).  I find the hardest part of writing Ghyll entries to be finding the most relevant actually existing article (I fudged it in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]] by implying that the most important part of the article was the part removed by the Copy Editor).  Picking just two novel terms to turn into phantoms is also difficult.  --[[User:Jcowan|Jcowan]] 09:08, 27 Sep 2004 (EDT)
 

Latest revision as of 08:26, 14 June 2005

This Talk: page once existed, but has since been resolved, refactored, or made irrelevant.
To see the text that was once here, choose a previous version under the History tab.
If you need to add new discussion, remove the reference to this template.