|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Out-Of-Game Discussion==
| + | Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT) |
| − | | |
| − | Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry, but please note that it has too many citations: you're meant to reference only ''one'' existing one, and ''two'' new entries (i.e. phantom entries), but you've listed several. The rationale is that if we define too many phantom entries, it's going to be impossible for us to catch up in subsequent turns. Please pick just one existing one, and two new ones. No need to change the body of your entry, just the '''Citations''' bit at the bottom -- we'll do the rest. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT) | |
| − | | |
| − | Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | How the devil can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 1:28, 12 Sep 2004
| |
| − | | |
| − | See what happens when I do this with a hangover?! Morbus was quite correct in his assumptions. My mistake was in the misinterpretation of the rules on '''Citations'''. I appreciate the correction. I was a bit rushed into this as I joined just in time to make the first deadline. My apologies for not reading all the FAQs well enough.
| |
| − | As to the fuzzy ritual reference... Well, as always, Mr. Cowan was correct and I have corrected myself. Hopefully, it is more clear now.
| |
| − | --[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 13:01, 12 Sep 2004
| |
| − | | |
| − | Right, I think I've corrected all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.
| |
| − | --[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
| |
